Bleach’s Final Arc Is Getting a New Ending—But Should It Rewrite the Past?
Joseph is the founder of Otaku Odyssey, blending SEO strategy with anime critique. He writes to spark debate and challenge conventional fandom narratives.
If you’re part of the Jujutsu Kaisen fandom, you already know: Episode 9 of Season 3 broke the internet. Gojo Satoru—arguably the most beloved character in modern anime—was defeated by Sukuna in a battle that was both visually stunning and narratively brutal.
But here’s the twist: Gojo didn’t just lose. He was erased. And fans are furious.
In a move that shocked even manga readers, the anime adaptation leaned into a more visceral, symbolic depiction of Gojo’s death. Sukuna’s final blow was animated as a metaphysical severing of Gojo’s soul—complete with eerie silence, flashbacks, and a haunting monologue.
Studio MAPPA pulled no punches. But did they go too far?
“This wasn’t a death. It was character assassination.”
“Gojo deserved a warrior’s ending—not existential erasure.”
“MAPPA turned a tragic moment into a spectacle. I’m done.”
Reddit threads are ablaze. TikTok edits are mourning. And Twitter (X) is split between grief and rage.
Some fans argue that Gojo’s death was necessary for narrative stakes. Others say it was a betrayal of everything he stood for.
Gojo was more than a character—he was the emotional anchor of the series. His charisma, power, and philosophy shaped the tone of Jujutsu Kaisen. Without him, the show risks:
Season 3 is technically brilliant. But emotionally? It’s a minefield.
Gojo’s death will be debated for years. It’s bold, brutal, and unforgettable. But whether it elevates Jujutsu Kaisen or undermines it… That’s up to the fans.
Did MAPPA make the right call—or did they just ruin anime’s coolest character? Let’s talk.
Source: Anime News Network – JJK Season 3 Episode 9 Breakdown
Joseph is the founder of Otaku Odyssey, blending SEO strategy with anime critique. He writes to spark debate and challenge conventional fandom narratives.
Comments
Post a Comment